<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Justkem&#039;s Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justkem.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>...Neo-Marxist Angst from the heartland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:22:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Kafka, begin the Metamorphasis!&#8221; by justkem</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/kafka-begin-the-metamorphasis/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>justkem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Roomie read that to me last night.  It all sounded vaguely familiar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roomie read that to me last night.  It all sounded vaguely familiar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Kafka, begin the Metamorphasis!&#8221; by Glock21</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/kafka-begin-the-metamorphasis/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Glock21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/?p=99#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Bwahahahahaha!

Dern bureaucrats just don&#039;t understand. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bwahahahahaha!</p>
<p>Dern bureaucrats just don&#8217;t understand. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rumorgate &#8216;08 by justkem</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/rumorgate-08/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>justkem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-93</guid>
		<description>Hey mark,

One of these days...

In the meantime, real life continues to keep me way too busy.  My regards to all and sundry over there.  One of these days when I can renew my membership and actually play a little chess, I will.  Until then, *waves at mark and passes all sorts of happy thoughts and fondness back toward the geek cluster.

~Kem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey mark,</p>
<p>One of these days&#8230;</p>
<p>In the meantime, real life continues to keep me way too busy.  My regards to all and sundry over there.  One of these days when I can renew my membership and actually play a little chess, I will.  Until then, *waves at mark and passes all sorts of happy thoughts and fondness back toward the geek cluster.</p>
<p>~Kem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rumorgate &#8216;08 by maekallen</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/rumorgate-08/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>maekallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 02:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/?p=96#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Hey Kem, just dropped by to say hi and wish ya well. Come drop by 1A sometime, huh? we miss ya.

Cheers, Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kem, just dropped by to say hi and wish ya well. Come drop by 1A sometime, huh? we miss ya.</p>
<p>Cheers, Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on auf Englisch, bitte? by california divorce</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/durcheinander-auf-englisch/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>california divorce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/durcheinander-auf-englisch/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wdalaw.com/cities/california-uncontested-divorce.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;California Divorce&lt;/a&gt;
this is a good blogs congratulations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wdalaw.com/cities/california-uncontested-divorce.php" rel="nofollow">California Divorce</a><br />
this is a good blogs congratulations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on auf Englisch, bitte? by Comprar Tadalafil</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/durcheinander-auf-englisch/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Comprar Tadalafil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/durcheinander-auf-englisch/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Excellent post. good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post. good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economy, war, Brittanywatch, economy, war, dems fighting, etc&#8230; by Robert</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/economy-war-brittanywatch-economy-war-dems-fighting-etc/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/economy-war-brittanywatch-economy-war-dems-fighting-etc/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>NO, No. You did not address my points at all. Adoption was the last thing I raised. Most of my discussion was about the rights of the unborn. Which, based on Roe v Wade, are few rights, indeed. However, these are moral questions that are at issue. Obviously the law of the land is proabortion. However, to decided whether it is moral brings in the idea of considering the unborn child. Does the unborn child have a &#039;say&#039; in the decision to be put-to-death? I think it ought to. Birth control is so easy nowadays. It is a wonder that anybody has an unplanned pregnancy. But, for the under-educated, who eith don&#039;t know, don&#039;t care, or have ulterior motives, they will be perpetually getting pregnant. They will be using the abortion system. They will lose out, in a Darwinian sense. And that is fine with me. But to allow such a decision to be made with such cavalier, is sad. We humans ought to be better than that. 

The pro-abortionist always juxtapose the unborn&#039; death with the pitiful life they would have to endure, being born into poverty, for instance. Death? That is better than poverty? Is there no spark of imagination that may make their pitiful life have some meaning? Is there no higher principle, beyond modern comforts, that make life worth living? Have we, as a society only focused on our personal cushy existance, so much so,that we conclude that any other, poor, hapless, hand-to-mouth, existance is worse than Death? 

The pro-death folks don&#039;t like to use terms such as death, killing, murder, fetalicide. Those terms are a stark reminder that our humanity is was is being killed, figuritively, but the baby is killed, literally. 

Don&#039;t slough off the &quot;Beethoven&quot; argument too lightly. Many a brilliant person came from quite meager beginings. Can not we humans excercise self-control, restraint, hope, perseverance? Are these concepts good only for the history books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NO, No. You did not address my points at all. Adoption was the last thing I raised. Most of my discussion was about the rights of the unborn. Which, based on Roe v Wade, are few rights, indeed. However, these are moral questions that are at issue. Obviously the law of the land is proabortion. However, to decided whether it is moral brings in the idea of considering the unborn child. Does the unborn child have a &#8217;say&#8217; in the decision to be put-to-death? I think it ought to. Birth control is so easy nowadays. It is a wonder that anybody has an unplanned pregnancy. But, for the under-educated, who eith don&#8217;t know, don&#8217;t care, or have ulterior motives, they will be perpetually getting pregnant. They will be using the abortion system. They will lose out, in a Darwinian sense. And that is fine with me. But to allow such a decision to be made with such cavalier, is sad. We humans ought to be better than that. </p>
<p>The pro-abortionist always juxtapose the unborn&#8217; death with the pitiful life they would have to endure, being born into poverty, for instance. Death? That is better than poverty? Is there no spark of imagination that may make their pitiful life have some meaning? Is there no higher principle, beyond modern comforts, that make life worth living? Have we, as a society only focused on our personal cushy existance, so much so,that we conclude that any other, poor, hapless, hand-to-mouth, existance is worse than Death? </p>
<p>The pro-death folks don&#8217;t like to use terms such as death, killing, murder, fetalicide. Those terms are a stark reminder that our humanity is was is being killed, figuritively, but the baby is killed, literally. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t slough off the &#8220;Beethoven&#8221; argument too lightly. Many a brilliant person came from quite meager beginings. Can not we humans excercise self-control, restraint, hope, perseverance? Are these concepts good only for the history books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economy, war, Brittanywatch, economy, war, dems fighting, etc&#8230; by justkem</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/economy-war-brittanywatch-economy-war-dems-fighting-etc/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>justkem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/01/24/economy-war-brittanywatch-economy-war-dems-fighting-etc/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Robert,

Yes, I covered that.  See point #4.  There are plenty of human beings who need love and support, food and shelter.  Having a baby just to give it away is quite literally taking food from the mouths of others in need of charity.

Your argument is the classic &quot;killing Beethoven&quot; one that pro-lifer&#039;s always come up with. The difference between your philosophy and my philosophy is that I don&#039;t value the potential life that could result as highly as I value the life that already exists on the planet and is in need of help.

The &quot;other people involved&quot; are not as heavily invested in the project as the mother.  Her body, her choice.  I agree that it&#039;s a pretty cruddy thing to do to a guy, killing his unborn child and all... but I have to say that if you&#039;re going to go to bed with someone, you should know them well enough to know how they feel about procreation and taking on parental responsibilities.  If the woman&#039;s views don&#039;t mesh well with your own, and you&#039;re unable to cope with the fact that your lack of a womb means you don&#039;t get the final decision, then you should find someone who is more likely to let you guilt them into having a baby against her better judgment.

Just don&#039;t be surprised when I bitch a little about paying for his free lunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>Yes, I covered that.  See point #4.  There are plenty of human beings who need love and support, food and shelter.  Having a baby just to give it away is quite literally taking food from the mouths of others in need of charity.</p>
<p>Your argument is the classic &#8220;killing Beethoven&#8221; one that pro-lifer&#8217;s always come up with. The difference between your philosophy and my philosophy is that I don&#8217;t value the potential life that could result as highly as I value the life that already exists on the planet and is in need of help.</p>
<p>The &#8220;other people involved&#8221; are not as heavily invested in the project as the mother.  Her body, her choice.  I agree that it&#8217;s a pretty cruddy thing to do to a guy, killing his unborn child and all&#8230; but I have to say that if you&#8217;re going to go to bed with someone, you should know them well enough to know how they feel about procreation and taking on parental responsibilities.  If the woman&#8217;s views don&#8217;t mesh well with your own, and you&#8217;re unable to cope with the fact that your lack of a womb means you don&#8217;t get the final decision, then you should find someone who is more likely to let you guilt them into having a baby against her better judgment.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t be surprised when I bitch a little about paying for his free lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why McCain? by justkem</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/why-mccain/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>justkem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Absolutely, Brian.  If you&#039;re going to be a shitty parent and you know it, I&#039;m pro-abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely, Brian.  If you&#8217;re going to be a shitty parent and you know it, I&#8217;m pro-abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why McCain? by brian</title>
		<link>http://justkem.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/why-mccain/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 02:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justkem.wordpress.com/?p=62#comment-71</guid>
		<description>really?  pro-abortion?  I mean, I could understand (though I may not agree with) pro-choice...but pro abortion seems a little extreme!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really?  pro-abortion?  I mean, I could understand (though I may not agree with) pro-choice&#8230;but pro abortion seems a little extreme!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
